The latest news from the music and tech industries
Hi there -
An article over on Fast Company asks today whether Spotify killed the album box set. Granted, that's a clickbait gem of a headline, but in reality there are some solid points being made in the piece that I feel speak to some of the things I was talking about last week, specifically around new music formats.
I think for some time everyone has viewed any evolution of the music format as something that might be indulged but only under great duress. It's also something that requires unilateral buy-in in order to take off. Either we all do it, or no one does.
Consider the climate around this topic at present though, and I'd argue the conditions have never been more favourable.
Admittedly, the current topic is more around how artists get paid more fairly and I think in general people interpret the recent comments from Lucian Grainge as relating more to how artists get paid than by the formats they are played on.
To me though, it is all part of the same mix. Streaming is an attention economy. We are in an attention recession. Ironically, this is why box sets are so prevalent now: labels (and artists) are realising they're a solid sell to a certain demographic (most likely older middle-aged men with higher disposable income, if I'm stereotyping).
But imagine a new format that might further enrich the music and the stories around it. As the article notes, Apple's iTunes LP took this approach, but 1) it was proprietary, thus failing on my point about universal access, and 2) it was costly and awkward to create an LP for just the one store.
I'm very aware that the average music punter is probably happy enough with Spotify, potentially seeing it as a slightly smarter take on commercial radio. However what I think a lot more people are coming around to is this notion that you could earn a lot more from a lot less people if the product carried far more inherent value.
Lucian Grainge spoke of "fewer cultural moments that fans can collectively share, all of which undermines the creativity and development of artists and their music that the platforms were, in part, designed to foster.”
One might argue that what is required to address that is not a change to streaming remuneration systems, but a whole new format that better places value at the heart of the product, not just convenience.
Have a great evening,
D.
🎶 written whilst listening to Mr Mitch's "Techno Dancehall 3". I *love* a great mixtape, and this is up there among the best. As the name implies, this plots a course through a kind of techno-meets-dancehall hybrid that is heavy as hell and absolutely incredible. Essential listening!
“The creation of the thing you are describing doesn’t exist yet,” says Azerrad. He thinks that, “it’s not a boxset, it’s not on Spotify—something that is in the middle can exist, and I think whoever ends up creating it will be quite profitable.” And though Azerrad laughed a little when talking about the profit potential, he’s right. “People want something that creates a deeper, richer experience,” he says; “something tangible.”
👆🏻Hot take: this builds on my point in the last Digest, namely that the case for a new music format is ever-growing...
During an experiment, they found that about 1% of the music the system generated was directly replicated from the songs on which it trained a threshold apparently high enough to discourage them from releasing MusicLM in its current state. We acknowledge the risk of potential misappropriation of creative content associated to the use case, the co-authors of the paper wrote. We strongly emphasize the need for more future work in tackling these risks associated to music generation.
👆🏻Hot take: I feel the real issue is being tiptoed around here. Bottom line is that the music being created was 1) trained on copyrighted music and 2) isn't able to be so different as to avoid a lawsuit. It's a legal hot mess, basically.
So why have bands struggled to find success compared with solo megastars like Ed Sheeran and Taylor Swift? The obvious culprit is social media, according to Chris Price, head of music for Radio 1 and 1Xtra, and the executive in charge of the stations playlists. Social media is more of a solo pursuit, he said. Its easier as a solo artist to convey who you are and the kind of artist you are on TikTok or Instagram than for four guys to do the same thing.
👆🏻Hot take: I think the word "singles" is missing before "charts" there. I'll confess that I never thought this was an issue, but (clang - namedrop alert) having worked on #1 albums from Wet Leg, The 1975 and Fontaines DC last year (as well as the Arctic Monkeys - an album that on any other week would have been #1 by a mile), I am not totally sure bands are in as much trouble as is being suggested.
Long-running boss of BMG, Hartwig Masuch, is stepping down as CEO of the Bertelsmann-owned company at the end of the year. He will be succeeded by Thomas Coesfeld, who joined Berlin-headquartered BMG as CFO in April 2021. In what BMG called part of a long-term succession plan, Coesfeld will officially succeed Masuch as CEO with effect from January 1, 2024.
👆🏻Hot take: I will be interested to see what changes when Coesfeld takes over.
Apple is apparently working on a way to let you make apps for its long-rumored mixed reality headset using Siri, according to a new report from The Information. Yes, that Siri, the one that routinely messes up basic requests or errors out in frustrating ways, will apparently be able to create entire augmented reality (AR) apps that youll be able to share with others on the App Store.
👆🏻Hot take: I can't help but share The Verge's scepticism here, but at the same time the intent is to be admired.
If only there was some sort of digital certificate, or token, that could mark something as entirely original and include all the metadata of attribution and ownership. Oh, wait NFT companies should be jumping on this opportunity now, solving the problem before it grows too big to handle.
👆🏻Hot take: this is a brilliant point, and is more grist to the mill that NFTs might find far more use for their functionality moreso than as a value currency.
The consumer doesnt care about [jargon], Hubman said. The industry will continue to evolve and make it easier to onboard to Web3 whether they know it or not. Id just like to encourage everyone to remove the jargon and speak like a normal human or brand, and youll be a lot more accessible and approachable.
👆🏻Hot take: any Web3 company worth its salt is now avoiding using jargon terms (I hope!) but this amounts to excellent common sense advice from Reddit.
Across the country, there’s a silent frustration brewing about an age-old practice that many say is getting out of hand: tipping.
👆🏻Hot take: I'm surprised that this article fails to mention the cultural disconnect between the US and other nations on this front. I recall an American friend remarking when last over here that the absence of that tipping pressure was a massive relief, which speaks volumes IMO.
When the news broke, it became one of the biggest scandals in music history. But it wasn’t an isolated incident.
👆🏻Hot take: revisiting *that* incident, but this one is a good read as it benefits from perhaps a little more hindsight. Did the 'singers' really deserve all the hate they received?